World domination 2
Of course it would be totally and utterly wrong of any country to by force try to rule the world, that would definitely lead to chaos.
But USA is presenting an image of being a democrasy, they don't ever say " we are doing this, because we want to take over the world" ( even though it may be what they are thinking..), they say "we are doing this because we want to help you". So from their point of view they are acting in a peacepreserving way and anybody who accuses them for anything different are immediatly being accused for being anti-democratic threats to all peacful societies and have to be converted or destroyed, for the "good" of all. It is a hostile takeover cloaked with the illusion of rightgeousness and they just might succeed with this, if nobody takes pretty immediate action and stop them, and who would that be? Who can say no to USA? It would have to be coalition of ALL other countries on the planet. So maybe that could lead to a world democrasy instead, but if that doesn't happen very soon USA will continue with their agenda. They are jumping in in every conflict now, acting as saviors of the situation, making everybodies business their business.
So I think the world goverment is on its way sooner than we would have expected it. What kind of world goverment it will be, is still left to be seen.
The poor state of the planet and all diseases are a common outer threats for humanity and not to meantion all the recent natural disasters. And also that we strive for constant improvement, not only survival. Humanity wants to be better than it is now. These factors will make the transition to a one goverment democrasy a more appealing idea than letting things be as they are now. We fear change but can never resist it in the end.
|
Return to Main Page
Comments
You need to read more about the history of the world as it relates to mankind. Throughout the last 30 centuries man has been trying to conquer other men. What is still said of those who were peaceful but conquered? Remember the aztecs? The US could take an isolationist approach, and hope that no one comes to conquer them. But do you think that Saddam would think twice about destroying the US if he had the chance to? I certainly doubt it. If the history of the world has taught us anything, it taught us that men will inevitably conquer their neighbor, so you should endeavor to be first.
Remember how we conquered Germany and Japan. They haven't turned out that bad in the last 50 years since we conquered them. The same could happen for Iraq, if we continue to occupy and force democracy on them.
| 
